Mentions.so vs GetMint (2026): Which AI visibility tool is right for you?

Key Takeaways

• GetMint costs the same as Mentions.so's starter plan (€99/mo vs $99/mo) but includes content creation tools and optimization recommendations -- Mentions.so focuses purely on tracking and sentiment analysis
• Mentions.so offers a free tier -- GetMint requires paid subscription from day one, though both offer trials
• GetMint positions itself as a strategic GEO platform with actionable insights -- Mentions.so is primarily a monitoring dashboard with daily reports
• Both track the same 7-8 major AI models (ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, Perplexity, Google AI Overviews, Grok, DeepSeek, Meta AI)
• Mentions.so emphasizes sentiment tracking across responses -- GetMint focuses on visibility scores and content gap analysis
• GetMint's pricing scales higher (up to €499/mo Pro tier) with more advanced features -- Mentions.so tops out at $599/mo for agencies

Overview

Both Mentions.so and GetMint emerged in the last two years to solve the same problem: brands were invisible in AI search results and had no way to track it. Traditional SEO tools like Semrush and Ahrefs weren't built for this -- they track Google rankings, not ChatGPT citations.

Mentions.so

Mentions.so launched as a straightforward AI mention tracker. You add your domain, set up prompts (or let their AI suggest them), and get daily reports showing where your brand appears across major language models. The platform emphasizes sentiment analysis -- not just whether you're mentioned, but how AI models talk about you (positive, neutral, negative). It tracks traffic coming from AI sources and compares your visibility against competitors. Over 100 brands use it, and the free tier makes it accessible for testing.

GetMint

GetMint bills itself as the first true Generative Engine Optimization (GEO) platform. It monitors the same AI models as Mentions.so but adds a layer of strategic recommendations and content creation tools. The pitch: tracking mentions isn't enough -- you need to understand why you're not showing up and how to fix it. GetMint analyzes content gaps, suggests optimization strategies, and helps you create content that AI models actually cite. It's positioned as a platform for teams serious about AI visibility, not just curious about it.

Worth noting that tools like Promptwatch take this action-oriented approach even further -- combining monitoring with answer gap analysis, AI content generation grounded in 880M+ citations, and crawler logs that show exactly how AI models interact with your site.

Side-by-Side Comparison

Monitoring capabilities

Both platforms cover the essential AI models that matter in 2026. ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, Perplexity, Google AI Overviews, Grok, DeepSeek, and Meta AI are all tracked. Neither platform supports niche or emerging models yet -- they stick to the mainstream engines where actual user traffic lives.

Mentions.so structures monitoring around workspaces. You create a workspace per brand or domain, add prompts (either manually or via AI suggestions), and the platform queries each AI model daily. Results show up in a dashboard with visibility percentages and sentiment breakdowns. The sentiment tracking is granular -- you see exactly how each model frames your brand (very positive, neutral, negative) and can track sentiment trends over time. This is useful if you're managing reputation or responding to negative coverage.

GetMint takes a similar approach but layers in "visibility scores" instead of just mention counts. The score reflects how prominently you appear in AI responses -- a passing mention scores lower than a detailed recommendation. GetMint also emphasizes tracking why you're not mentioned. If a competitor shows up and you don't, GetMint surfaces the content gaps or authority signals that might explain it. This moves beyond pure monitoring into diagnosis.

Both platforms let you compare against competitors in real-time. Mentions.so shows competitor visibility as percentages (e.g. "Kajabi 67%, Thinkific 59%, Teachable 46%"). GetMint uses a similar visual approach with heatmaps and comparison charts.

Verdict: Mentions.so wins on sentiment depth, GetMint wins on diagnostic insights. If you care more about how you're portrayed, go Mentions.so. If you care more about why you're invisible, go GetMint.

Prompt management and customization

Prompts are the core of AI visibility tracking. The questions users ask determine whether your brand gets cited. Both platforms handle this differently.

Mentions.so offers two paths: add prompts manually or use their AI prompt generator. The AI analyzes your domain and suggests relevant queries (e.g. "What are the top platforms for managing an online business with customizable design options?"). You review and accept or reject each suggestion. Once prompts are set, the platform queries AI models daily and tracks changes. You can add unlimited prompts on higher tiers, but the Starter plan caps you.

GetMint also supports custom prompts but focuses more on strategic prompt selection. The platform helps you identify high-value queries based on search volume and competitive gaps. Instead of tracking every possible mention, GetMint encourages you to focus on prompts where you have a realistic shot at ranking. This is more resource-efficient -- you're not wasting queries on prompts dominated by huge competitors.

Neither platform offers the kind of prompt intelligence you get with tools like Promptwatch, which provides volume estimates, difficulty scores, and query fan-outs showing how one prompt branches into sub-queries. That level of prioritization helps you focus on winnable battles.

Verdict: GetMint edges ahead with strategic prompt selection. Mentions.so gives you more flexibility to track everything, but that can lead to noise.

Content optimization and recommendations

This is where the two platforms diverge sharply.

Mentions.so is a monitoring tool first. It tells you where you're mentioned, how you're portrayed, and how you compare to competitors. The "insights" are mostly observational -- "Your visibility dropped 5% this week" or "Competitor X is mentioned more frequently." You get recommendations in daily reports, but they're generic: "Improve your content," "Build more backlinks," "Engage with AI-friendly formats." There's no built-in tooling to act on these suggestions. You're expected to take the data and figure out the next steps yourself.

GetMint positions itself as an optimization platform, not just a tracker. It analyzes why you're not showing up and gives you specific actions to take. If a competitor ranks for a prompt and you don't, GetMint surfaces the content gaps -- the topics, angles, or authority signals your site is missing. The platform includes content creation tools to help you fill those gaps. You're not just monitoring; you're actively improving your AI visibility. GetMint's tagline is "Be the brand every AI recommends," and the product reflects that ambition.

That said, GetMint's content tools are still relatively basic compared to dedicated GEO platforms. Promptwatch goes further with an AI writing agent that generates articles, listicles, and comparisons grounded in real citation data (880M+ citations analyzed), prompt volumes, and competitor analysis. The content isn't generic SEO filler -- it's engineered to get cited by ChatGPT, Claude, and Perplexity based on what those models actually look for.

Verdict: GetMint wins decisively. If you want to act on insights instead of just collecting them, GetMint is the better choice. Mentions.so leaves you stuck at the monitoring stage.

Traffic attribution and analytics

Both platforms track traffic coming from AI sources, but implementation details matter.

Mentions.so includes an AI traffic tracking feature that shows how much traffic you're getting from AI models and where it's coming from. The dashboard breaks down traffic by source (ChatGPT, Perplexity, etc.) and shows trends over time. This is useful for understanding ROI -- if you're investing in AI visibility, you want to know if it's driving actual visitors. The tracking appears to rely on referrer data, which works for some AI models but not all (ChatGPT, for example, doesn't always pass clean referrer headers).

GetMint also tracks AI traffic and ties it back to specific prompts and mentions. You can see which queries are driving visitors and which AI models are sending the most traffic. This helps you double down on what's working. GetMint's analytics dashboard is more detailed than Mentions.so's, with breakdowns by prompt, model, and time period.

Neither platform offers the depth of traffic attribution you get with tools that integrate directly with Google Search Console or analyze server logs. Promptwatch supports GSC integration, code snippet tracking, and server log analysis to connect AI visibility directly to revenue -- not just traffic, but conversions and customer acquisition.

Verdict: GetMint has slightly better analytics, but both are limited. For serious attribution, you'll need additional tooling or integrations.

Pricing comparison

Mentions.so starts with a free tier that lets you test the platform with limited prompts and features. The Starter plan at $99/mo is positioned for individual users or small teams. Growth at $299/mo adds more prompts and workspaces. Agency at $599/mo is for teams managing multiple brands with full collaboration features. Annual billing saves 16%.

GetMint has no free tier -- you start at €99/mo (roughly $105/mo at current exchange rates). The Growth plan at €229/mo ($243/mo) adds more advanced features and higher limits. Pro at €499/mo ($530/mo) is for larger teams or agencies. GetMint offers a free trial but requires a credit card upfront.

Both platforms are priced similarly at the entry level, but GetMint's lack of a free tier is a barrier for casual users or those just exploring AI visibility. Mentions.so's free tier is a smart move -- it lets you test the concept before committing.

Verdict: Mentions.so wins on accessibility with the free tier. GetMint's pricing is reasonable but requires upfront commitment.

User interface and experience

Both platforms prioritize clean, modern dashboards. Neither feels clunky or outdated.

Mentions.so uses a card-based layout with visibility percentages, sentiment breakdowns, and competitor comparisons front and center. The dashboard is intuitive -- you can see at a glance how you're performing across AI models. Daily reports arrive via email with summaries and action items. The prompt setup flow is straightforward: add a workspace, choose or generate prompts, and start tracking. The AI prompt generator is a nice touch -- it removes the guesswork for users who don't know what to track.

GetMint has a more data-dense interface. The dashboard shows visibility scores, content gap analysis, and optimization recommendations in a single view. It's designed for users who want to dig into the details, not just skim high-level metrics. The content creation tools are integrated directly into the platform, so you can move from insight to action without switching tabs. The learning curve is slightly steeper than Mentions.so, but the payoff is more actionable intelligence.

Verdict: Mentions.so is easier to pick up, GetMint is more powerful once you learn it. Choose based on whether you want simplicity or depth.

Pros and cons

Mentions.so pros

• Free tier makes it easy to test without risk
• Strong sentiment analysis across AI models
• Simple, intuitive dashboard
• AI-suggested prompts remove guesswork
• Daily email reports keep you informed
• 16% annual discount

Mentions.so cons

• No content optimization or creation tools
• Recommendations are generic and observational
• Limited to monitoring -- you're stuck after seeing the data
• Traffic attribution relies on referrer data (not always accurate)
• Higher tiers required for unlimited prompts

GetMint pros

• Content creation tools help you act on insights
• Strategic prompt selection focuses on winnable queries
• Detailed analytics tie traffic back to specific prompts
• Visibility scores reflect prominence, not just mentions
• Content gap analysis shows exactly what you're missing
• Positioned as a true optimization platform

GetMint cons

• No free tier -- requires upfront commitment
• Steeper learning curve than Mentions.so
• Content tools are basic compared to dedicated GEO platforms
• Pricing in euros may complicate budgeting for US teams
• Less emphasis on sentiment tracking

Who should pick which tool

Choose Mentions.so if:

• You're new to AI visibility tracking and want to test the concept with a free tier
• Sentiment analysis is critical for your brand (e.g. reputation management, PR monitoring)
• You have a small budget and need basic monitoring without optimization tools
• You prefer a simple, easy-to-use dashboard over data-dense interfaces
• You're comfortable taking insights and building your own action plan externally

Choose GetMint if:

• You're serious about improving AI visibility, not just tracking it
• You need content creation tools to fill gaps identified by the platform
• You want strategic recommendations based on competitive analysis and content gaps
• You have budget for a paid tool from day one (no free tier to test)
• You're managing multiple brands or working in an agency setting with higher-tier needs

Consider alternatives like Promptwatch if:

• You need the full action loop: find gaps, generate content, track results
• You want AI crawler logs showing exactly how ChatGPT, Claude, and Perplexity interact with your site
• You need content grounded in 880M+ citations, not generic recommendations
• You want prompt intelligence (volume estimates, difficulty scores, query fan-outs)
• You're tracking Reddit and YouTube discussions that influence AI recommendations
• You need ChatGPT Shopping tracking or multi-language/multi-region monitoring

Final verdict

GetMint is the better choice for most teams serious about AI visibility. It costs the same as Mentions.so's starter plan but delivers more value with content optimization tools and strategic insights. Mentions.so is a solid monitoring dashboard, but it leaves you stuck after showing you the data. GetMint helps you act on what you learn.

That said, Mentions.so's free tier is a smart entry point if you're just exploring AI visibility or have a tight budget. The sentiment tracking is also stronger, which matters for reputation-focused teams.

For teams that want to go beyond monitoring and optimization into full-scale AI visibility management -- with content generation, crawler logs, and attribution tied to revenue -- neither tool goes far enough. That's where platforms like Promptwatch come in, offering the complete action loop from gap analysis to content creation to results tracking.

One-liner: GetMint for action, Mentions.so for monitoring, Promptwatch for the full optimization cycle.