Mentions.so vs AIClicks (2026): Which AI visibility tool is better?

Key Takeaways

• AIClicks is cheaper for getting started: $59/mo (30 prompts) vs Mentions.so's $99/mo (50 prompts), though Mentions.so offers a free tier
• Mentions.so has better sentiment analysis: Tracks positive/neutral/negative sentiment across models, while AIClicks focuses more on visibility metrics
• AIClicks includes content generation: Built-in AI content creation based on prompt analysis; Mentions.so focuses purely on tracking and recommendations
• Both cover the same 7-8 major LLMs: ChatGPT, Perplexity, Claude, Gemini, Grok, DeepSeek, Meta AI (plus Google AI Overviews)
• Mentions.so gives clearer "why you're not mentioned" insights: More diagnostic depth on what's missing from your content
• AIClicks has a 3-day free trial: Mentions.so has a limited free tier instead

Overview

Mentions.so

Mentions.so positions itself as the tool that tells you not just where you're mentioned in AI responses, but why you're not mentioned and how to fix it. It tracks brand mentions across ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, Perplexity, Grok, DeepSeek, Meta AI, and Google AI Overviews. The platform emphasizes sentiment analysis -- showing whether AI models are portraying your brand positively, neutrally, or negatively -- and competitor comparison. Over 100 brands use it to monitor their AI visibility.

The core pitch: "Stop guessing. Mentions.so analyzes how AI talks about your brand and gives you clear steps to rank higher and shape the narrative."

AIClicks

AIClicks takes a similar approach but adds content generation into the mix. It monitors the same set of major LLMs (ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini, Claude, Grok, and others) and tracks how often your brand appears in AI-generated answers. The platform discovers what prompts people are actually asking, shows you where competitors are beating you, and then helps you create optimized content to close the gap. Used by 1,000+ brands and agencies.

The pitch: "Rank #1 in ChatGPT. Reach millions of people using LLMs to find products."

Side-by-Side Comparison

Pricing comparison

Mentions.so is more expensive at the entry level but includes more prompts. AIClicks gets you in the door cheaper but with fewer prompts tracked. If you're monitoring a lot of different queries, Mentions.so's Starter plan gives you more runway.

Feature deep-dive

LLM coverage

Both tools monitor the same core set of AI models: ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, Perplexity, Grok, DeepSeek, Meta AI, and Google AI Overviews. This is table stakes in 2026 -- any serious AI visibility tool needs to cover these platforms.

Neither tool appears to track Mistral or Copilot explicitly based on their marketing pages, though both claim to support "all major AI platforms." If you need coverage beyond the big 7-8, you'll want to confirm with support before committing.

Verdict: Tie. Both cover what matters.

Sentiment analysis

This is where Mentions.so pulls ahead. The platform explicitly tracks whether AI models are mentioning your brand in a positive, neutral, or negative context. You get a sentiment breakdown over time ("Very Positive Sentiment" vs "Negative Sentiment" on specific days) and can see how the narrative is shifting.

AIClicks doesn't emphasize sentiment tracking in its marketing. The focus is more on visibility metrics (are you mentioned? how often?) rather than tone analysis.

If you care about brand reputation and not just raw mention counts, Mentions.so gives you more to work with.

Verdict: Mentions.so wins on sentiment depth.

Competitor tracking

Both platforms let you compare your visibility against competitors. Mentions.so shows real-time visibility percentages ("Kajabi 67%, Thinkific 59%, Teachable 46%") and tracks how those numbers change over time. AIClicks offers similar competitor comparison but doesn't surface as many specific examples in its marketing.

In practice, both tools likely deliver similar competitor insights -- you can see who's beating you for specific prompts and by how much. The difference is presentation: Mentions.so makes competitor data more prominent in its UI.

Verdict: Slight edge to Mentions.so for clearer competitor visualization.

Content recommendations

Mentions.so focuses on diagnostic recommendations: "Here's why you're not mentioned, here's what's missing from your content." The platform analyzes AI responses and tells you what gaps to fill. You still have to create the content yourself (or use another tool).

AIClicks goes a step further by including AI-powered content generation. Once you know what prompts you're missing, the platform can draft optimized articles or pages to target those queries. This is a meaningful workflow advantage if you're trying to move fast.

The trade-off: Mentions.so's recommendations might be more thoughtful (since they're not trying to automate the writing), while AIClicks gives you a faster path from insight to published content.

Verdict: AIClicks wins if you want an all-in-one workflow. Mentions.so wins if you prefer to control the content creation yourself.

Prompt discovery

Both tools offer AI-suggested prompts based on your domain and industry. You can also add custom prompts manually. AIClicks emphasizes its "4-step formula" (enter URL, discover prompts, get content plan, track results), while Mentions.so highlights its ability to show you exactly what each model says about your brand.

The core functionality is similar: both platforms help you figure out what questions people are asking AI models in your space, then track whether you're showing up in the answers.

Verdict: Tie. Both handle prompt discovery well.

Traffic attribution

Mentions.so explicitly mentions tracking "AI traffic" and showing you where it's coming from. AIClicks also includes analytics to measure traffic driven by AI mentions. Neither tool provides detailed implementation instructions on their marketing pages (e.g., whether they use tracking pixels, server log analysis, or Google Search Console integration).

If you're serious about connecting AI visibility to actual revenue, you might want to look at tools like Promptwatch that offer multiple attribution methods (code snippet, GSC integration, server logs) and page-level tracking to see exactly which content is driving results.

Verdict: Both claim traffic tracking; implementation details unclear from public info.

User interface and ease of use

Mentions.so's marketing emphasizes a clean, visual dashboard with sentiment charts, competitor heatmaps, and daily performance reports. The screenshots show a polished interface with color-coded sentiment indicators.

AIClicks also shows a modern dashboard with prompt tracking, visibility scores, and content planning tools. The "4-step formula" suggests a more guided, workflow-oriented approach.

Without hands-on testing, it's hard to declare a winner here. Both look user-friendly from the outside.

Verdict: Likely a tie; both invest in UI/UX.

Reporting and insights

Mentions.so offers daily performance reports and weekly summaries. The platform highlights specific insights like "Keyword 'digital marketing' performance is up by 12%" or "Mobile traffic saw a decrease of 5% this week."

AIClicks provides similar reporting with daily updates on prompt performance and visibility changes.

Both tools seem to deliver the same core reporting features: regular updates, trend tracking, and actionable insights.

Verdict: Tie.

Pros and cons

Mentions.so pros

• Sentiment analysis gives you a clearer picture of brand reputation, not just visibility
• Free tier lets you test the platform before committing
• More prompts included in the Starter plan (50 vs 30)
• Strong focus on explaining why you're not mentioned and what to fix
• Competitor comparison is front and center in the UI

Mentions.so cons

• Higher starting price ($99/mo vs $59/mo)
• No built-in content generation -- you have to create content elsewhere
• Less emphasis on workflow automation
• Annual discount is only 16% (some competitors offer more)

AIClicks pros

• Cheaper entry point ($59/mo)
• Built-in AI content generation speeds up the optimization loop
• 3-day free trial lets you test before paying
• Clear 4-step workflow from audit to content to tracking
• Used by 1,000+ brands (larger user base than Mentions.so's 100+)

AIClicks cons

• Fewer prompts in the Starter plan (30 vs 50)
• Less emphasis on sentiment analysis
• No free tier (trial only)
• Pricing for mid-tier plans not transparent on the website

Who should pick which tool

Pick Mentions.so if:

• You care about brand sentiment and reputation, not just raw mention counts
• You want more prompts tracked at the entry level
• You prefer to control content creation yourself (or already have a content team)
• You want a free tier to experiment before committing
• You're focused on understanding the "why" behind your AI visibility gaps

Pick AIClicks if:

• You want an all-in-one tool that generates content for you
• You're on a tighter budget and $59/mo works better than $99/mo
• You value workflow automation over deep sentiment analysis
• You're comfortable with a 3-day trial instead of a free tier
• You want a faster path from insight to published content

Consider both if:

• You're an agency managing multiple clients and need to compare features at the Agency tier
• You want to run a side-by-side test to see which UI and insights resonate more with your team

Final verdict

Both Mentions.so and AIClicks do the core job: they track your brand's visibility across major AI models, show you where competitors are beating you, and give you recommendations to improve. The differences come down to emphasis and workflow.

Mentions.so is the better choice if you care about brand sentiment and want deeper diagnostic insights into why you're not showing up. The sentiment tracking is genuinely useful for understanding how AI models are portraying your brand, not just whether they mention you. The higher price ($99/mo) buys you more prompts and a more analysis-focused platform.

AIClicks is the better choice if you want speed and automation. The built-in content generation means you can go from "I'm not ranking for this prompt" to "I just published an optimized article" without leaving the platform. The lower entry price ($59/mo) makes it easier to justify for smaller teams or solo marketers.

Neither tool is a clear winner across the board -- it depends on whether you value depth (Mentions.so) or speed (AIClicks). If you're still unsure, start with AIClicks' 3-day trial or Mentions.so's free tier and see which workflow feels more natural for your team.