GetMint vs Authoritas AI Tracker (2026): Full comparison

Key Takeaways

• GetMint offers flat monthly pricing (€99-€499) with unlimited queries, while Authoritas uses a credit system (£90-£1,125/mo) where each AI query costs credits -- GetMint is simpler for predictable budgets
• GetMint includes built-in content creation tools as part of every plan; Authoritas focuses purely on monitoring and tracking without content generation capabilities
• Authoritas covers more AI models (7 LLMs including DeepSeek) vs GetMint's focus on the major players (ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini, Google AI Overviews)
• GetMint is purpose-built for GEO (Generative Engine Optimization) with optimization workflows; Authoritas positions itself as an add-on to traditional SEO tracking
• For publishers tracking content licensing and IP usage across AI platforms, Authoritas has specific features; GetMint targets brands and agencies doing active optimization
• Both offer free trials, but GetMint's trial includes content generation credits while Authoritas gives you 50 query credits to test tracking

Overview

GetMint

GetMint

AI visibility and reputation management platform

View more

GetMint positions itself as the first dedicated platform for Generative Engine Optimization. The core pitch: monitor how your brand shows up in AI search results, then actually do something about it with built-in content tools. It tracks your visibility across ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini, and Google AI Overviews, then helps you create optimized content to improve those rankings. The platform targets brands and agencies who want an end-to-end workflow -- not just dashboards showing problems, but tools to fix them.

Pricing is straightforward: three tiers with flat monthly fees and unlimited AI queries. You're buying monitoring capacity (number of tracked keywords/prompts) plus content generation credits. The Starter plan at €99/mo gets you 50 keywords and 10 AI-generated articles per month. Growth (€229/mo) bumps that to 150 keywords and 30 articles. Pro (€499/mo) gives you 500 keywords and 100 articles, plus API access.

Authoritas AI Tracker

Authoritas AI Tracker

AI search visibility tracker for brands, publishers, and ret

View more

Authoritas AI Tracker is part of a larger SEO platform that's been around since before "GEO" was a term. The AI tracking module launched as an add-on to their existing rank tracking and technical SEO tools. It monitors brand mentions, sentiment, and citations across seven AI engines: ChatGPT, Perplexity, Claude, Gemini, DeepSeek, Google AI Overviews, and Bing AI. The focus is visibility measurement -- which prompts mention your brand, what sentiment they carry, which sources the LLMs cite when they talk about you.

Pricing uses a credit system. Each AI query costs credits (1-5 credits depending on the model). You buy credit bundles: Free tier gives you 50 credits to test, P1 is £90/mo for 2,000 credits, P2 is £225/mo for 6,000 credits, P3 is £495/mo for 15,000 credits, and Enterprise is £1,125/mo for 42,000 credits. The AI Tracker is separate from their main SEO platform (which has its own pricing starting at £99/mo for Essential). Publishers get specific features for tracking content usage and potential licensing opportunities.

If you're also looking to understand how AI search visibility fits into a broader content strategy, Promptwatch takes a similar action-oriented approach with content gap analysis and built-in writing tools grounded in citation data.

Promptwatch

AI search monitoring and optimization platform

View more

Side-by-Side Comparison

Pricing comparison

The pricing models are fundamentally different, which makes direct comparison tricky. Here's the breakdown:

GetMint's pricing is simpler if you know how many keywords you want to track -- you pay a flat fee and query as often as you want. Authoritas makes you budget credits carefully. Querying GPT-4o costs more credits than querying a lighter model like Gemini Flash. If you run 100 queries a day across multiple models, you'll burn through credits fast.

For a brand tracking 100 keywords across 4 LLMs with daily checks, GetMint's €229/mo Growth plan gives you unlimited queries. With Authoritas, 100 keywords × 4 models × 30 days = 12,000 queries. At 1-2 credits per query (optimistic estimate), that's 12,000-24,000 credits, putting you in the £495-£1,125/mo range. GetMint wins on cost predictability here.

Feature deep-dive

LLM coverage

Authoritas tracks seven AI engines: ChatGPT, Perplexity, Claude, Gemini, DeepSeek, Google AI Overviews, and Bing AI. GetMint covers four: ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini, and Google AI Overviews. If you need Claude or DeepSeek visibility, Authoritas is your only option here. For most brands, the big four (ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini, Google AIO) drive 90%+ of AI search traffic, so GetMint's coverage is sufficient. But if you're in a market where Claude or DeepSeek has meaningful adoption, the extra coverage matters.

Both platforms let you track custom prompts/queries. GetMint calls them "keywords," Authoritas calls them "questions" or "prompts." Same concept: you define the queries you care about ("best CRM for small business," "top project management tools 2026"), and the platform checks how each LLM responds.

Content creation and optimization

This is the biggest difference. GetMint includes AI content generation as a core feature. Every plan comes with article credits (10/mo on Starter, 30/mo on Growth, 100/mo on Pro). The content generator is trained on GEO principles -- it writes articles designed to get cited by LLMs, not just rank in Google. You feed it a topic, it analyzes what's currently ranking in AI search for that topic, and outputs an article optimized for AI visibility.

Authoritas has zero content creation tools. It's purely a monitoring and analytics platform. You see where you're invisible, but you're on your own to fix it. For agencies or in-house teams with writers, that's fine -- you take the insights and brief your content team. For smaller teams or brands without dedicated content resources, GetMint's built-in generator is a major advantage.

Sentiment and brand safety

Authoritas does sentiment analysis on brand mentions. When an LLM mentions your brand, Authoritas scores it as positive, neutral, or negative. You can track sentiment trends over time and get alerts if negative mentions spike. This is useful for brand reputation management -- if ChatGPT starts recommending against your product, you want to know immediately.

GetMint tracks brand mentions but doesn't do deep sentiment scoring. You see whether you're mentioned and in what context, but there's no automated positive/negative classification. For most use cases ("are we visible for this prompt?"), that's enough. If you're in a reputation-sensitive industry (finance, healthcare, legal), Authoritas's sentiment features are worth the extra cost.

Citation and source tracking

Both platforms show which sources LLMs cite when they mention your brand. If Perplexity recommends your product and cites three blog posts, you see those citations. This is critical for understanding why you're visible (or not) -- if competitors are getting cited from Reddit threads and you're not, you know where to focus.

Authoritas goes further for publishers. It tracks how often your content gets cited across all queries (not just brand-specific ones), which helps publishers understand the value of their content to AI platforms. This feeds into licensing negotiations -- if your articles are being cited 10,000 times a month by ChatGPT, you have data to support a licensing deal. GetMint doesn't have publisher-specific features.

Reporting and integrations

GetMint offers standard dashboards with visibility scores, trend charts, and competitor comparisons. The Pro plan includes API access, so you can pull data into your own BI tools or build custom workflows. No mention of pre-built integrations with other platforms.

Authoritas is part of a larger SEO suite, so it integrates with their rank tracking, technical SEO, and backlink modules. If you're already an Authoritas customer for traditional SEO, the AI Tracker slots in naturally. As a standalone product, it's less clear how well it integrates with third-party tools -- the website doesn't mention API access or integrations outside their own ecosystem.

User interface and ease of use

GetMint's interface is clean and modern -- it feels like a product built in 2024-2025 for a specific job (GEO). The workflow is: set up keywords, monitor visibility, generate content, track improvements. Everything is designed around that loop.

Authoritas's AI Tracker feels like an add-on to an older platform. The core Authoritas product has been around for years, and the AI tracking module was bolted on. It works, but the UX isn't as streamlined. You're navigating between traditional SEO features and AI tracking features, which can feel disjointed if you only care about AI visibility.

Customer support and resources

GetMint offers email support and a knowledge base. No mention of dedicated account managers or onboarding unless you're on a custom enterprise plan.

Authoritas has been in the SEO space longer, so they have more mature support infrastructure -- phone support, dedicated account managers for higher tiers, and a larger library of training resources. If you need hand-holding, Authoritas is the safer bet.

Pros and cons

GetMint pros

• Flat pricing with unlimited queries -- easier to budget
• Built-in content generation saves time and money vs hiring writers
• Purpose-built for GEO with optimization workflows, not just monitoring
• Clean, modern interface focused on one job
• Lower entry price (€99/mo vs £90/mo for fewer features)

GetMint cons

• Covers only 4 LLMs (no Claude, DeepSeek, or Bing AI)
• No deep sentiment analysis or brand safety features
• Newer platform with less mature support infrastructure
• No publisher-specific features for licensing or IP tracking
• API access locked to Pro plan (€499/mo)

Authoritas AI Tracker pros

• Tracks 7 LLMs including Claude, DeepSeek, and Bing AI
• Detailed sentiment analysis for brand reputation management
• Publisher features for content licensing and IP tracking
• Part of a larger SEO platform if you need traditional rank tracking too
• Mature support infrastructure with account managers

Authoritas AI Tracker cons

• Credit-based pricing is confusing and can get expensive fast
• No content creation tools -- monitoring only
• Feels like an add-on to an older platform, not a purpose-built GEO tool
• Separate pricing for AI Tracker vs main SEO platform creates complexity
• Less clear optimization workflows -- you get data but limited guidance on what to do with it

Who should pick which tool

Pick GetMint if:

• You're a brand or agency focused on improving AI search visibility, not just tracking it
• You want content creation built in and don't have a dedicated writing team
• You need predictable monthly costs without worrying about credit limits
• ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini, and Google AI Overviews cover your target audience (they do for most brands)
• You want a modern, streamlined platform built specifically for GEO

Pick Authoritas AI Tracker if:

• You're a publisher tracking how AI platforms use your content for licensing negotiations
• You need coverage of Claude, DeepSeek, or Bing AI in addition to the major players
• Brand sentiment and reputation monitoring are critical (finance, healthcare, legal sectors)
• You're already using Authoritas for traditional SEO and want to add AI tracking
• You have a content team in place and just need visibility data, not content generation
• You're an enterprise with budget for the higher-tier plans (£495-£1,125/mo) where the credit system makes more sense

Pick something else if:

• You need deep optimization tools beyond basic monitoring -- platforms like Promptwatch offer content gap analysis, crawler logs, and prompt intelligence alongside tracking
• You're on a tight budget and need a free tier with real functionality (both platforms require paid plans for meaningful use)
• You want to track AI visibility as part of a broader content strategy with Reddit/YouTube insights and traffic attribution

Final verdict

GetMint wins for most brands and agencies doing active GEO work. The combination of unlimited queries, built-in content generation, and straightforward pricing makes it the better value for teams who want to optimize, not just monitor. You're paying €229/mo for the Growth plan and getting 150 keywords tracked plus 30 AI-generated articles -- that's a complete workflow.

Authoritas AI Tracker is the better choice for two specific audiences: publishers who need to track content usage for licensing deals, and enterprises who need the broadest possible LLM coverage (7 models) with deep sentiment analysis. The credit-based pricing works against it for everyone else -- you're constantly doing math to figure out if you have enough credits, and the costs add up fast if you're tracking aggressively.

For a typical brand tracking 100-200 keywords across the major AI engines and wanting to actually improve their visibility, GetMint delivers more value at a lower price point. Authoritas makes sense if you have specific needs (publisher licensing, Claude/DeepSeek coverage, sentiment tracking) that GetMint doesn't address, but for the core job of "track and improve AI search visibility," GetMint's integrated approach beats Authoritas's monitoring-only model.